Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Blankfein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blankfein. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2013



Published In CommPRO,biz 2013.12.10
 
The Banksters Walk Free

In a breathtakingly clueless comment last month (2013.11.12 SIFMA) at an industry conference, Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs CEO, is reported to have expressed regret that they were part of the problem leading up to the recession. Not regret that his company’s actions helped to crash the world economy ruining thousands, putting millions out of work and causing unimaginable suffering. He expressed no regret for that at all. He just wishes they hadn’t engaged in “trading practices” that created an image problem for his firm.
Blankfein is reported to have told the conferees, “I wish the organization hadn't done complex CDOs circa '06 and '07." A CDO (collateralized debt obligation) is a fancy name for bundling up a bunch of mortgages and such and hustling them as investments. Goldman sold them to pension plans, banks and the like. After all, what could go wrong? Housing always goes up; even if the mortgage holders fail to make their payments, the property will cover the loss, right? We all know the answer to that now. It seems that Goldman Sachs knew the answer back then. They knew their CDOs were full of “Crap” (their terminology), and at the same time they were hawking them, Goldman was betting they would fail. Worse, when they failed the American taxpayers paid off on that bet. And all Lloyd Blankfein sees in this is a PR problem? 

The SEC saw fraud and brought civil charges against Goldman. The agency settled for a paltry $500 million, with no admission of guilt. For Goldman Sachs that’s pocket change. According to some reports they cleared well north of $10 billion double-dealing CDOs. Poor Lloyd, Goldman Sachs took a public relations hit while their actions destroyed the lives of millions. If there was any justice Blankfein and a flock of other money-changers like him would be in jail. Considering the suffering their fraudulent actions brought down on millions around the world, they should face prosecution. 

Surprisingly, only a few of these modern day money-changers have faced prosecution over the last few decades. A bunch of minor league hustlers were jailed in the 1980s and early 1990s over the Savings & Loan crisis, alongside closing down close to 800 S&Ls with assets in the $400 billion dollar neighborhood. Since then not much has happened to the banksters, mostly because our Justice Department has some illusion that these crooks are too-big-to-jail. In case after case the DOJ has allowed blatant criminal behavior on the part of big league banksters to go unpunished because they believe that jailing the top guys at these banks might rock the boat and cause problems in our economy. 

That shows an unimaginable lack of business knowhow. Nobody is irreplaceable, that’s especially true when it comes to replacing corporate leaders engaged in illegal activities. There are good people, honest people in most organizations ready to move up and do the right thing. If not, there are topnotch folks ready to come in and put them on the straight and narrow. Folks who understand that the ethical business model is not only the right path; it is the surest path to profitability.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Published 2013.02.22 in CommPRO.biz

3,800 to Zero
 

Following the Savings & Loan Crisis a couple decades ago, roughly 3,800 bank executives were jailed. The more severe crisis we are slogging though, has for all intents and purposes, produced zero convictions, no jail time for the Wall Street executives who triggered it. You may have heard that one of three financial rating agencies that awarded AAA ratings to the toxic mortgage packages the big banks referred to as “Crap,” Standard & Poor’s, faces $5 billion in Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) fines. However, not one S&P executive faces prosecution.

The appalling failure of federal and state entities to hold responsible those who threw us into the most damaging recession in seven decades is shameful. In reviewing the litany of excuses offered for this travesty, this much is clear: it is difficult to prove fraud. And, George W. Bush’s Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson created a bailout atmosphere seemingly designed for the ethically challenged monster banks. Our leaders, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, Attorney General Holder, and the President himself, can’t seem to deal with the legal challenges. It’s a situation crying out for creativity.
 

Al Capone, whose criminal “Creds” ran from hooch to hookers with lots of killings thrown in, laughed in the faces of the authorities just as the bankers have been laughing since the bailout. The banks sucked up the taxpayers’ bucks in billion dollar gasps, like the dying beasts they were. Once they were on sound footing, instead of using our money to help the economy, they went right back to the same crazy risky stuff that caused the recession. And why not? They know they can stick the taxpayers with their losses. When the authorities couldn’t pin Capone’s criminal activities on him they got creative and tried him for tax evasion, netting Capone 11 years in Alcatraz.
 

Senator Carl Levin watched Goldman Sachs CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, smirk his way through testimony before his Senate Committee and then turned his findings over to the Justice Department. Levin, a Harvard Law graduate and experienced prosecutor, was clearly disturbed when Justice failed to take action. The DOJ also declined to prosecute egregious criminal behavior on the part of HSBC, citing a fear that to do so might take the bank down and threaten our economy.
 

It’s time for creativity. The Supreme Court says corporations are people, so let’s prosecute their living parts. Let’s charge top executives and boards of directors who know –or have a fiduciary responsibility to know– what their corporation is up to. Sending the Board and the “C” Suite off to the slammer is not going to sink the ship. One thing we know for sure: there are lots of topnotch managers who could take over and probably do a better job than those they replace, especially when replacing the nitwits who green-lighted the HSBC mess. Unlike a massive fine that becomes a “Cost of Doing Business,” the prospect of a jail term should put a halt to the greed-fueled behavior all too common in our banking sector.