Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Financial Collapse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial Collapse. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Unexpected Consequences

Unexpected consequences frequently arise from actions at every level of life. Not in the least when it comes to enacting new legislation. Take the Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act (AKA Dodd–Frank), created in response to the reckless actions of a handful of bankers that triggered the 2008 financial collapse.


(Actually the collapse was triggered by the banking lobbyists’ success in conning a brain dead 1999 Congress into removing one of the last remaining firewalls in the circa 1933 Banking Act (AKA Glass–Steagall). This Act protected us from this kind of nonsense for +/- 70 years; anybody for reinstating Glass–Steagall? Dodd–Frank left the gap opened in 1999 unfilled and the banks are headed full tilt for the same cliff they took us over in 2008. But that’s another subject for another day)



Dodd–Frank will “undermine existing compliance programs” according to its critics–read lobbyists. That pile of bovine excrement has vanished in the light of a study conducted by the SCCE (Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics).



The SCCE surveyed compliance and ethics professionals on Dodd–Frank. Surprise, they found the exact opposite of the banking lobby fueled fears and expectations. The SCCE found more transparency; companies are making employees more aware of how to react when they come across misdeeds or misbehavior in the workplace, even if it’s your boss. They found compliance programs grown stronger thanks to Dodd–Frank.



The Act has also triggered more ethics training at the management level. Anything that improves ethics in our society is good news. Business ethics is not an oxymoron. Most people strive to do the right thing day in and day out. The impression that nice guys finish last is dead wrong. Study after study shows that –all things being equal– an ethics driven business model will out perform any alternative. Does that mean that dog-eat-dog never wins? Of course not, but even then the good guys will win bigger.



If that’s true, then why do we never hear about it? Simple, good news is no news. We want to hear about the unusual, the dramatic. Same thing with drama, on
stage, television or the movies, if it’s not comedy it’s got to be action. Even in the most famous good guy movie of all time, It’s a Wonderful Life, it took divine intervention to save George Bailey.



Aristotle is quoted* as declaring that Philosophy** led him, “to do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law” That exactly defines ethics. And while ethics often gets bundled up with compliance, there’s a vast chasm between complying with a rule or law and doing the right thing.

 

* Supposedly uttered by Aristotle according t0 Laërtius Diogenes, who lived six or seven hundred years after Aristotle    (BTW not the lantern dude, Diogenes of Sinope. He also lived six or seven hundred years before Laërtius Diogenes).

** Philosophy, a system of principles for guidance in practical affairs. – Dictionary.com 09.20.11


Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Doing Time


There has been endless speculation as to what and or who created the giant economic bubble that burst in 2007.  To prevent a global financial meltdown the Bush administration created a huge bailout program for banks and for the colossal insurer AIG. The bailout not only prevented a bad situation from becoming unimaginably worse, it has paid off for the taxpayers as the banks pay back the loans with interest. It appears that the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler may pay off as well.

None of this is very comforting to those who lost their jobs and homes. Those folks and many of the rest of us have been wondering when the high flyers whose reckless behavior triggered all this might get theirs. Perhaps that time has come.

Last week (4/13/11) the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released its two-years-in-the-making report “Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse.” Frankly, given the spineless catering to the special interests over a few modest reforms in the Dodd/Frank Bill, it was hard to imagine that this investigation would amount to much. Surprisingly the members of this Committee were on the job. They were, as the saying goes, “Taking names and kicking butt.”

They paint a detailed picture of the out-of-control atmosphere that saw investment bankers enabling downstream players, mortgage brokers and lenders to spread money across the housing market like there was no tomorrow. All showered with encouragement from the boneheads at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, not to mention the rating agencies and –of all people– the head of the Federal Reserve Bank.

People were encouraged –coached if you will– to falsify loan applications. They ended up owning property they could not afford and well, you know the story. These sure-to-fail loans were bundled into increasingly sophisticated –read deceptive– packages and sold as securities by the investment bankers.

It’s not that the bankers didn’t know they were selling crap; they even called it crap inside the trading desks. And they protected themselves; as they sold these so-called toxic securities they bet against them at the same time. Some bankers were more aware than others. Not that any of them had reason to miss what was really going on. Read Michael Lewis’ The Big Short for an inside view.  

Prosecutors are poring through the 650-page Senate Report looking for criminal behavior. Many believe that those who triggered the catastrophe are too big to go to jail, just as their organizations were too big to fail. Maybe not. No major public official in NY State ever headed behind bars until last Friday (4/15/11) when former Controller Alan Hevesi was led out of court in cuffs sentenced to one to four years in jail. So maybe there’s hope that we will see some of these arrogant bankers in cuffs on their way to jail.

It would be nice if the members of the Congress would rethink the laws that allowed all this to happen; that still allow Wall Streeters to gamble. Investment bankers need to get back to creating capital for business. That would help in a real way. It would create jobs. Isn’t that what they keep talking about in DC?
© 2011 GLG