Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Thursday, January 24, 2013



Published 2012.01.24 in CommPRO.biz 

Do The Math

Those of us who have spent time in communications, be it journalism or public relations, are familiar with what we call a “Grandstand Move.” That’s when an outfit with a well-deserved lousy image will roll out some event or policy designed to make them look good. With luck they garner a ton of positive media attention. So it is with Walmart. Their latest is a pledge of a job for every returning veteran during their first year out of the service. It got Walmart more positive media than they’ve seen in years. Even we were impressed until we got to thinking about it.

The majority of jobs in the Wonderful World of Walmart are low-wage, part-time with zilch benefits. When you’ve served in the workplace culture prevalent in our military, who wants that kind of job?  Bill Simon, who runs the Walmart stores in the United States, joined the company less than ten years ago. He was paid about $8.5 million last year. Our guess is that not many of the hundred thousand vets Simon estimates Walmart will hire over the next five years will take home even the average US paycheck, let alone much above that figure. A hundred thousand hires over five years is just 20,000 a year, roughly four or five a year per Walmart store. So if you do the math Walmart’s offer to our veterans doesn’t add up to all that much.

Ironically, Bill Simon’s big announcement came just a few days before Fortune magazine rolled out their 2013 listing of the 100 best places in America to work. It’s no surprise that Walmart didn’t make the list. It was dominated at the top by Google and other enterprises that employ mostly high-skill, high-wage people. Except for the one in fifth place, Wegmans, a family owned supermarket chain.

Wegmans is one of only thirteen companies that have been on the Fortune list since its debut. They have more employees than any other company in the top forty on the list, and while they pay well, the majority of their people are not in the upper brackets. The Fortune research model includes a scientific sample drawn from all full-and-part time employees. In Wegmans’ case that includes the young people who round up shopping carts from the icy and snow-covered parking lots in the northeast where their stores are located.

The message is pretty clear, it’s the culture. Walmart can roll out all the PR events and policies they can come up with, it won’t change their culture. Their people on the front line do not create the culture – that comes from the top. Wegmans is in the hands of the fourth and fifth generations of the Wegman family who carefully guard their culture. Walmart is controlled by the Walton family. Their wealth is close to a hundred billion dollars; sadly that’s about all they have to show for it.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012



My 2012 Top Ten 
Business Ethics Milestones

This year as every year almost everyone and almost every business strives and succeeds to maintain the highest ethical standards. It’s our nature and we know that our most precious asset is our reputation. After all, who wants to do business with a crook? It is, however, a struggle; and it’s too easy to take that first little step over the line onto the slippery slope. Of course there are those who seem ethically challenged. They spend a lot of time and treasure scheming and even more trying to cover their tracks. Ultimately they end up at the bottom of the slope, way past ethics into criminal territory. Most of this year’s milestones fall into the latter category, but there are some outstanding rays of sunshine.

#10 Let’s start out with some good news. A nationwide research study by Satmetrix, a West Coast provider of customer experience software, measured the attitudes of 30,000 consumers. Their findings reinforce the ethical business model’s value. It’s no surprise that companies boasting a long history of ethical standards top the list. Wegmans, Costco, Apple, Jet Blue, American Express, Virgin America, Amazon, Lowes, Google, all the usual suspects lead when it comes to doing the right thing. And guess what? They are leaders when you check their bottom line.

#9 There’s no such glow when you look at a few of our wealthiest Americans and biggest financial institutions; you get more of a Greasy Sleazy Feeling. They think nothing of turning our commodity markets into gambling halls, manipulating the price of food and fuel. Markets designed to support commodity producers have become a playpen for those with more money than morals. There’s a cure: limit commodity purchases to end users. Good for producers, good for end users, good for consumers, good for America.

#8 The ethical cesspool at the center of the media colossus Rupert Murdoch spawned on London’s Fleet Street, is beginning to suck him into its vortex. Unfortunately, it’s spread beyond his native Australia and Great Britain; it has spilled onto our shores. Murdoch became an American citizen so he could legally own broadcast properties here. He bought a couple smarmy newspapers like his British rags. He has also taken over and is twisting the once the once well-regarded Wall Street Journal. His big bucks come from broadcast holdings; satellite operations in Asia and Great Britain, cable outlets here. And then there’s his production arm producing television programs and motion pictures. Murdoch lunged over a line that most media tend to avoid, plunging into politics, even attempting to pick out his own presidential candidate. That kind of activity is common in Great Britain, not so much on this side of the pond. It’s especially disturbing when practiced by Scum-Lord Rupert Murdoch.

#7 Big Pharma's Big Con. The real cost of bringing a new drug to market averages $90 million a pop; a lot of money but a fraction of the$1.3 billion dollars they claim. Unless of course you include marketing, that’s where the big bucks go: flooding doctors’ offices with materials and samples, even hiring them to pitch other docs on the newest, latest, slightly updated drug. Add in the avalanche of print and television advertising urging patients to pressure their doc. It all adds up to sky high drug prices. Prices protected by a law prohibiting the government from negotiating lower prices– all courtesy of Big Pharma’s friends in the Congress. It’s enough to make you sick.

# 6 When the lobbyists pushed through “The Commodity Futures Modernization Act” opening up Wall Street to gambling, they unleashed a chain of events that resulted in the collapse of the world economy eight years later. Wall Street began leaping one ethical barrier after another and today everyone but the bankers is suffering. Dodd-Frank is designed to rein in some of the worst of this. The bankers are fighting these sensible controls. Our economic future depends on how it works out.

#5 Foxconn, a Taiwanese company with operations in China and around the world, makes many of the electronic toys that fill our lives. A British newspaper report described the life of a 21-year-old woman working ninety hours a week for less than fifty dollars a month. They calculated that allowing for inflation that fifty bucks comes to, “about half the wage weavers earned in Liverpool and Manchester in 1805.” Ponder that ethical issue the next time you finger the electronic toys in your pocket.

#4 Little did we know that the HSBC slogan, “Bank as easily around the world as you do at home” was to be taken literally. That this British “too-big-to-fail” bank was laundering cash for Mexican Drug Lords, hiding funds from the IRS in far off India for wealthy Americans, providing US currency to a Middle Eastern bank said to be a source of terrorist funding, and generally thumbing their nose at American laws and regulators. The bank has been hit with a record $1.9 billion fine in the US. The $27.5 million Mexico hit them with last summer along with the legal fees they have run up brings the total over $2 billion. That sounds like a lot of cash until you compare it to their 2011 profit, nearly $17 billion, or to a bonus pool of more than $4 billion that the HSBC executives split up. And surprise, it looks like none of those big-wigs are facing jail. The $2 billion amounts to pocket change for HSBC, just another minor cost of doing business.

#3 “Income Inequality” is a really big deal in the minds of Americans. A Pew study found it to be our greatest source of tension. Two thirds of the respondents see the divide between the super rich and those on down the food chain as our major concern. Reinforcing that view, in a Bloomberg Global Poll more than 1,200 investors, analysts and traders say it harms the economy and harms growth. Why is nobody willing to do anything about it?

#2 How can we turn our backs on sexual abuse? The Church, College Athletics, The Boy Scouts, who knows where it will be found next? The abuse of our children by institutions we trust is horrific, to cover it up is unforgivable.

#1 The Gift of Life - 4,800 people died last year waiting for a kidney. There were nearly 100,000 waiting for one a few months ago. The numbers are similar across organ donation programs. How could that happen? Consider that the latest available annual highway death toll (2010) totaled 32,885 individuals, a tragic number. But most with healthy organs, it’s disgraceful that so few remember that should something fatal befall us, our organs could help others live. Every business, everywhere we gather, organ donation should be a primary focus. We can think of no higher moral and ethical goal than assuring that if we give up our lives, we give life to others.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Surprise, Surprise 
The Same Great Winners

A nationwide research study by Satmetrix, a West Coast provider of customer experience software, reinforces the ethical business model’s value. By and large it’s no surprise that companies boasting a long history of ethical standards top the Satmetrix Benchmark study. Wegmans, Costco, Apple, Jet Blue, American Express, Virgin America, Amazon, Lowes, Google, all the usual suspects top this  study and when it comes to doing the right thing by all their stakeholders. And guess what? They are leaders when you check their bottom line.

Satmetrix measured the attitudes of 30,000 consumers and used the results to rank 200 brands in 22 industries to create its Net Promoter Scores (NPS®) for each company. People were asked to score the companies they do business with on a zero-to-ten point scale. NPS® scores are based on a customer’s willingness to recommend their company. The percentage of those giving a company a 9 or 10, minus the percentage of those rating them 6 or lower, produces the company’s NPS® score.

Surprisingly, the highest score -an 83% NPS®- was in the banking sector, USAA, an organization that offers a wide range of financial services and insurance to its members - active duty and military veterans. When you look at the broad picture banking had more detractors than supporters. Seven large banks were in negative territory with Wachovia leading the charge to the bottom with a minus 15% NPS® score. Among major credit cards American Express was on top with a 43% NPS®

Amazon’s 76% NPS® was a close second to USAA’s overall lead, followed not too far behind by ethically oriented Wegmans and Costco at 73% & 71% respectively. These two perennial poster children for maintaining a healthy bottom line while covering all the ethical bases, manage it in spite of the large number of entry level jobs in their operations. Wegmans also has managed to stay on the Fortune 100 Best Places to Work list ever since it was created. They have been in the top five for eight years running and were ranked number one in 2005. That’s amazing when you consider the benefits and salary levels of companies like Google that they go head-to-head with year after year for the Fortune workplace honor roll.

Costco was on top of the retail pile again this year with a NPS® 71%, Nordstrom and Belk had a very respectable 66%. Once proud and respected Sears is at the bottom of that list with less than half the Costco score, a 35% NPS®. Is it any wonder? Reminiscent of a famous Roman fiddle player, Sears Chairman Edward Lampert is reportedly laying out $40 million for an estate just north of Miami; it’s said to be a record price for a single-family home in Dade County. All this while he is gutting the iconic retailer, selling off and closing Sears stores. Adding a let-them-eat-cake touch, the ethically challenged Lampert’s new digs features a series of “Versailles-Style Reflecting Pools” that will enable them to reflect on all the little folks they crushed so they could enjoy this idyllic setting.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Reputation, Reputation, Reputation!


Harris Interactive rolled out their 12th annual Reputation Quotient® (RQ®) last week (5/2/11). They compiled the views of 30,104 Americans to determine what Harris describes as the “public’s positive perception” of  “the 60 most visible companies in the United States.” It is great news that overall these well-known companies have earned a dramatically improved image in this year’s rankings.

Google sits atop the Harris RQ® study for the first time. Certainly no big surprise given the company’s well-known drive to be good guys. It’s no surprise either to find the big banks at the other end of the scale with Goldman Sachs leading the race to the bottom. Actually, Goldman is the major loser across the board. They were buoyed slightly by a few of the study respondents who –can you imagine– saw Goldman as a good place to invest. In the same vein, however, Goldman was rated the very least likely to be recommended; probably by those investors Goldman hammered.

Goldman Sachs’ view from the sewer doubtless makes it hard for them to even see the top of the Harris Sixty. However, in the unlikely event that they should ever glance in that direction with a mind to improving their reputation, they might try practicing Google’s informal motto, “Don’t be evil.”

Actually, more companies than ever are striving and succeeding in bettering their reputation. The number of companies that attained the Harris “Gold Standard” RQ® score of 80 or above increased dramatically to an all-time record high this year. It almost tripled from 6 in 2010 to 16 in 2011. Three factors drove the reputations of these list toppers: transparency, ethics, and performance. This is the first time ever that there have been more than a handful of companies at this level.

There are ten companies that have scored above 75 for the last ten years or more. That kind of consistent reputation maintenance shows a true commitment to doing the right thing.  No surprises here: Johnson & Johnson, Coca Cola, 3M, Procter & Gamble, Sony, General Mills, UPS, FedEx, Microsoft & Kraft Foods. The 2011 study has 27 companies with an RQ® above 75, and a 28th just below that bar. While the number of companies scoring 80 and above grew dramatically, the number of companies that scored 75 or better was only up one this year over last from 26 to 27; about half of the Sixty.  The bottom half of the list seems to be made up of those who haven’t gotten the message that, “ethics works.”

In nearly every ranking you are once again looking at the same cast of characters–including the bottom feeders.Leading that gang Goldman Sachs is the least trusted company in the 2011 Harris RQ® Study. Sachs and four other big banks take half of the ten spots in the bottom rank among those respondents who say they would “definitely not” trust these companies. The other five are a dog’s breakfast of oil, chemical, and cable television companies along with one of the biggest insurers on the planet, AIG.