Published 2012.01.30 in CommPRO.biz

Too Big To Loan?

Earlier this month (2013.01.16) the president of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, Richard Fisher, delivered a speech worthy of a Texas straight shooter. It was followed up the next day by a 30+ page report supporting the need to deal with the danger a handful –about a dozen- Too Big To Fail (TBTF) banks present to our economy.

These are the same financial monsters whose reckless actions pulled the rug out from under the world economy and brought about the 2008 crash. The folks who put millions of people out of their homes, crippled small businesses and drove the unemployment numbers in America sky high. The same handful of reckless banksters, who rolled the dice, lost and left the rest of us with no alternative but to bail them out.

In an effort to avoid a repeat of this disaster the Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act. In the end the TBTF banks’ lobbying efforts allowed them to stay focused on risky speculative (AKA gambling) deals, knowing full well that contrary to its intent, Dodd-Frank does nothing to protect against another taxpayer bailout. Mr. Fisher concedes there’s little chance that we can rein-in their reckless behavior in the short term. He does, however, offer an escape hatch to take the taxpayers off the hook to some degree.

If he had his druthers, Mr. Fisher would slice the monster banks into separate entities, none large enough to destabilize our economy. He would peel away all of their financial activities that fall outside the banks’ traditional role. While that remains the long-range goal laid out in the Dallas Fed’s report, their short-term goal seems to correct much of the problem.

Mr. Fisher points out that the insurance protection created in 1933 –The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)– was intended to cover our hometown and regional banks. The 98.8% we ordinary folk are used to dealing with, not the 12 monster banks, the 0.2% who hog nearly 70% of all banking assets. Assets we furnish them with to make small business loans and create jobs. But that’s not what the use it for. Instead they use the free money we furnish to make wild bets, secure in the knowledge that if they lose, we pay.

Restricting FDIC protection to its intended role would roadblock moves like the one Bank of America made the first of this month (January 2013). They moved derivative contracts worth $15 trillion from their broker-dealer division to their insured depository institution. Guess who’s on the hook if those puppies go bad?

It’s past time that the low interest cash we provide the banks goes to the 98.8%, the regional and Community Banks who will provide small business loans. If the monster banks -the 0.2%- want to gamble, let them do it with their investors’ cash. And make sure those investors know that their funds will not insured by America’s taxpayers.

Banking 101

The “K” Street Banker Boys are pouring millions into the political arena in a desperate effort to hold on to the massive Las Vegas style gambling enterprise that characterizes too much of our banking sector today. Banking differs from Vegas in two important ways, however.

1)  When the bets the Wall Street Bankers place against the suckers (AKA “us”)  go against them, they just run to the taxpayers (us) who cover their losses. So they can’t lose. That’s too-big-to-fail banking.

2) The banks managed to get themselves immunized from the state lottery laws, so they can bet on anything. For instance, they could legally bet whether you will make your mortgage payment on time when they have no connection to you or your mortgage.

This set some of our biggest financial institutions onto a path focused on profit and the outrageous bonus structure that this gambling hall culture has spawned. A culture defended haughtily by JPMorgan Chase “Whiner-in-Chief” Jamie Dimon, who chose newspapers to justify the banker’s insane paychecks.

Duded out in his trademark 1950’s “Ducktail” do, Jamie is quoted, “Obviously our businesses have high capital and high human capital,” implying that nobody in newsprint land could compare. What nonsense. And, their capital –cash, that is– is not theirs, it’s ours, the billions we gave the banks to stabilize our economy. So what are they doing with our money? They are rolling the dice again, confident that we will bail them out again, when the dice come up snake-eyes again.

 “Proprietary Trading,” as the bankers like to call it, was a principle cause of the recession. This practice is a recipe for disaster. Here and there the milk-toast mild Dodd Frank Act does have a tooth left. The one dealing with proprietary trading, called the Volcker Rule, is facing a firestorm from the banking lobby. It would pretty much take gambling out of the banking business, push the bankers back into the real world where they can fail, and when they do, fail without taking the country down with them.

When Bill Clinton signed “The Commodity Futures Modernization Act” opening up Wall Street to gambling, Washington unleashed a chain of events that resulted in the collapse of the world economy eight years later. Wall Street began leaping one ethical barrier after another and today everyone but the bankers is suffering.

The folks who actually toil day in and day out for a living, like those struggling to find a workable journalism model, shouldn’t have to put up with sneers from a second-rate punk like Jamie Dimon. Banking at every level has but one reason to exist, to provide the capital that sustains our economic life. Dimon and his lot are clueless when it comes to that kind of banking.

A Return To Stability

Close to 3000 movers and shakers took to the world stage in Switzerland last week (01.25-29) for the annual World Economic Forum, commonly referred to as Davos. This year’s theme was The Great Transformation, Shaping New Models. And while there was much discussion on new models, most looked a lot like the model that emerged from the Great Depression and served America well for two generations. That would be the model we dismantled in the 1980s and 1990s.

As the doings began at Davos, Bloomberg released their Global Poll of more than 1.200 investors, analysts and traders who shared their thinking on the state of the economy. Surprising numbers; more than half agree with the Occupy Wall Street movement that income inequality harms the economy, harms growth. Seven in ten believe the banks have too much control over government. Two-thirds of the respondents think governments should pursue policies to tackle that issue.

A participant on the opening panel at Davos, Sharan Burrow, general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation said, “If you’ve got a group that is too big to fail, what it means is that you are the biggest bullies on the planet. The financial sector has lost its moral compass.” More than 80% of the respondents to the Bloomberg study think banks need to be regulated so they’re not too big to fail.

 

About two-thirds see at least some truth in the argument that bankers’ actions are driven by greed and harm the economy. This is in line with studies showing that when executive pay scales escalate too far above the average employee in their company, it takes focus off what’s best for the company and moves it to what’s best for those at the top. When bankers start focusing on their pay, they forget their role in the community. They forget they are there to protect the funds the members of the community entrust to them. They forget that they are there to find local businesses that need loans to grow. They forget that they are there to help people in their community finance their homes. 

When it comes to the investment bankers on Wall Street, they get so focused on their paychecks that they forget they are there to help create capital. Instead they are busy devising ways to play high-stakes gambling games, all the while setting up their customers to take the fall if the bank’s bet goes south. Moral compass? There’s none to be found. While most business people and small businesses are striving to do the right thing every day, the Wall Street types have the morals of an alley cat.