Published in CommPRO.biz 2013.09.24

The Beat Goes On & On & ON

Remember the scene in a Pirates of the Caribbean movie where Captain Jack is gazing from a crow’s nest soon disclosed to be on the mast of a sinking vessel as it approaches a dock where the never-say-die pirate leader steps off and heads off into another hilarious adventure? That must be how Jamie Dimon, the captain at JP Morgan Chase, is feeling these days. Problem is, there is no dock in sight for this buccaneer; he’s up to his neck in trouble and nobody is laughing.

Dimon just can’t seem to catch a break, or more appropriately dodge a bullet. The slowly unraveling London Whale loss of billions involves at least three Chase minions, two of whom are facing criminal charges. The third has to be bothering the folks in carpetland back at Chase headquarters in New York City. Bruno Iksil has not been charged, apparently because he is supplying information on the two guys who have been charged. Bruno is a Chase Vice President. Nonetheless, since Chase has tens-of-thousands of VPs, Bruno is still a grunt. You know your bank is too big when you count the VPs by the tens-of-thousands.

We all know what’s going to happen when one guy starts pointing fingers, it won’t be long until others join in. That fact, along with reports that all these guys kept pointing up the line when this disaster started to unfurl, has to be unsettling. It played out in London, but the players there pointed to headquarters in New York City time and again when the losses were skyrocketing; at last report well north of six billion dollars. The finger pointing is going to spread up the food chain. The London traders claim they acted on guidance from headquarters. That could get very ugly for all the players right up to Jamie Dimon.

As if all that wasn’t enough, The New York Times broke a story about Chase bank hiring practices in China. The bottom line is that Chase seems to have a history of giving jobs to the off-spring of high ranking individuals in the Communist Party who head state owned businesses. Often businesses that have no relationships with Chase, at least not until they hire somebody’s kid. Reports say the Feds have a spreadsheet showing how hires connect to deals Chase was chasing.

Any one of these could be dismissed –as Chase is depicting them– as the acts of lower level rogue employees. Taken together it seems clear that the employees at JP Morgan Chase are under pressure to maximize profit by any means necessary by a management that knows that the taxpayers are on the hook to bail them out again. A management that reflects its leader’s ethics, Jamie Dimon’s ethics. 

Published in CommPRO.biz 2013.09.17

Good News “IS” News, Occasionally

We find ourselves largely focused on a minority. The majority, most of us, are trying to do the right thing everyday. By nature we are an honest hard-working people. And most businesses understand that an ethical model is a roadmap to long-term strong profitability. Take care of your customers, employees, vendors, community, and the environment; and the bottom line takes care of itself.

In our weekly pursuit of ethical issues, we find ourselves largely commenting on players who choose to ignore the ethical model. Those not interested in long-term growth. Then there are those who operate in a non-competitive market. A market that is structurally immune to competition such as healthcare. When was the last time someone struck a deal with a surgeon whilst headed for the operating room?

More disturbing are those made immune to failure through their lobbying efforts. Take the monster banks. They have created a world where they are not only too-big-to-fail; they are permitted to take part in unimaginably outrageous practices. They make huge bets –outright gambling– on anything they can label “investing;” even with depositors’ funds insured by the United States taxpayers. Worse, our Department of Justice is afraid to go after these scumbags; a monumental failure.

So between big pharma, predatory healthcare entities, and smarmy bankers, we have lots of unethical issues. We aren’t forgetting that the scumbags make up a tiny minority. Most folks in healthcare are there for the right reasons, executing herculean efforts everyday. Most bankers focus on depositors and businesses in their community. They guard depositors’ savings; make loans to keep businesses growing, homes building, and dreams evolving.

However, good news rarely makes “The” news. That’s what we like when we find a major story about a newsworthy ethical happening. IBM, a pioneer in personal computers, sold that business in 2005 to Lenovo, a Chinese company most of us never heard of. Since then Lenovo has grown their share of the home computer market, recently surpassing Hewlett-Packard. Ninety days ago Lenovo opened an assembly plant in North Carolina. 

All of that is nice, but the icing on the cake came earlier this month (2013.09.02) when Lenovo CEO, Yang Yuanqing, announced that he was splitting $3.25 million –most of his annual bonus– with his workers. For the workers in North Carolina the $300 bucks they received was a nice surprise. For the vast majority in China the $300 is roughly a month’s pay.

Hats off to Yang. He gave away $3 million of his bonus last year. It wasn’t news here until Lenovo built their plant and Yang announced that he would split his time between two headquarters in Beijing and Morrisville, NC. Those who see this as a marketing ploy may have a point, but the impact on Lenovo workers in twenty countries is still there. Unlike other big players, Lenovo produces their computers, phones, laptops and tablets in their own factories. And we’ll bet they don’t have nets stretched around them to prevent the workers from jumping to their death.

Published in CommPRO.biz 2013.09.04

Too Small to Ignore?

It appears that Darryl Layne Woods may spend a year in jail and have to cough up a hundred grand in fines. Woods is the majority owner and former Chairman and CFO of the Mainstreet Bank in Ashland, Missouri; the bank has branches in Bunceton and Prairie Home. The three small towns with a total population of a little over 4,300 are in the Columbia, Missouri area. In addition to likely jail time and the fine, Darryl has been barred from ever again having any role in banking.

You see when the government was passing out money to support the banking sector following the crash, Mainstreet was given a little over a million dollars. Darryl “invested” about a third of that in a luxury condo in Florida. When asked what they had done with the money, the bank was not totally forthcoming about the condo. Darryl signed that document and is taking the fall. Part of the plea deal absolved his wife from any involvement. The bank will, of course, have to pay back all of the TARP funds if they haven't already. It turns out that the bank sold the condo in Florida this spring and made a few bucks on their investment.

A statement on the Mainstreet website from the bank’s Board seems to indicate that it’s all some big misunderstanding and that the bank had been making real estate investments of this nature for some time. The government claimed that the Florida condo was intended for use by Darryl and other bank executives.

Mainstreet Bank has been around for ninety years. It’s the kind of community bank that’s vital to small town America. Darryl Woods is 48 years old and listed as “majority owner.” That could mean anything from 51% up; a local newspaper just referred to him as the bank’s “owner.” We would guess he was used to doing whatever he felt like and this time he went too far, or was careless with the paper work.

It’s hard to understand how this differs from the banks taking billions in TARP and subsequent billions from the Federal Reserve while somehow managing to pay $140 billion in bonuses to their executives in 2009 alone. That’s the same year Darryl Woods spent $381,487 to buy a condo in Florida. Did the big banks just do a better job filling out paper work than the Mainstreet Bank in small town Missouri?

Last week (2013.08.27) Bush era Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, the architect of TARP, said he was very disappointed with the bonuses. That would seem to be about five years too late. Paulson went on to claim that he could not have made bonuses a part of the deal for TARP funds or the banks would have backed away. If that was true, why were those same big banks desperately sucking up hundreds of billions from the Fed month after month even after they took the TARP funds? The Mainstreet Bank folks -being from Missouri- have to be saying, “Show Me.”