Published CommPRO.biz 2013.10.03
Wall Street Ethics
Mid-September (2013.09.15) marked five years since Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks ever, filed the largest bankruptcy ever, sending sky rockets up all over the world and marking the beginning of what we’ve come to call the “Great Recession.” Lehman’s implosion triggered a serious of herculean bailouts of the rest of our banking sector by the American taxpayers.
Hank Paulson, who became Treasury Secretary after a career at Goldman Sachs, saw a danger of another depression if the banking sector collapsed. He hurriedly threw together the bailouts. However, he failed to impose the controls needed to keep the banks from abusing these funds, leaving them free to award themselves over the top bonuses. The Federal Reserve kicked in billions more, throwing open the doors to the risky gambling (see London Whale) that caused the collapse.
Lehman wasn’t the only bank gone wild; all of the dozen or so monster banks were behaving badly. Lehman was just pushing the limits of the regulation-free climate the banking lobby created over the preceding two decades. Repo 105 was the accounting gimmick of choice at Lehman. The tricksters there would sell off billions of their really bad stuff before each quarterly reporting period, making their books look as though they were sound when in fact they were anything but. Emails, written just before the bankruptcy, show that senior management pushed their subordinates to cover their tracks.
On May 18, 2008, almost exactly two months before the bankruptcy filing, Senior Vice President Matthew Lee had a letter hand delivered to four of Lehman’s top executives with a copy to their house counsel. In it he detailed these practices and questioned both their legal and ethical grounds. Management responded by firing him. Later, Lee identified Repo 105 as one source of the collapse for the federal investigators. Matthew Lee is still out of a job today; nobody on Wall Street has hired this honest man.
Not so most of the schemers who played fast and loose with the financial facts at Lehman. According to a Huffington Post tally, three quarters of the Lehman folks -47 of 63 involved in the Repo 105 scam- are employed in the financial world and doing just fine thank you. In fact, while most Americans are struggling to recover from the crash and millions are unemployed, the Wall Street banksters are fine.
And why shouldn’t they be –aside from ethics and stuff like that– the banks know if they overplay their hand again, Repo 105 or whatever, a taxpayer bailout is just around the corner. So they gamble with your savings, secure in the knowledge that the FDIC will cover their losses and that we’ll loan them whatever they need to get back on their feet. Just don’t ask them to support the small businesses that create jobs or anything like that. Leave that to the suckers who run the regional and community banks.
Showing posts with label London Whale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label London Whale. Show all posts
Saturday, October 5, 2013
Labels:
bailout,
banksters,
Community Banks,
Ethics,
FDIC,
Federal Reserve,
Goldman Sachs,
Great Recession,
Hank Paulson,
Huffington Post,
Lehman Brothers,
London Whale,
Matthew Lee,
Repo 105,
Wall Street
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Published in CommPRO.biz 2013.09.24
The Beat Goes On & On & ON
Remember the scene in a Pirates of the Caribbean
movie where Captain Jack is gazing from a crow’s nest soon disclosed to be on
the mast of a sinking vessel as it approaches a dock where the never-say-die
pirate leader steps off and heads off into another hilarious adventure? That
must be how Jamie Dimon, the captain at JP Morgan Chase, is feeling these days.
Problem is, there is no dock in sight for this buccaneer; he’s up to his neck
in trouble and nobody is laughing.
Dimon just can’t seem to catch a break, or more
appropriately dodge a bullet. The slowly unraveling London Whale loss of
billions involves at least three Chase minions, two of whom are facing criminal
charges. The third has to be bothering the folks in carpetland back at Chase
headquarters in New York City.
Bruno Iksil has not been charged, apparently because he is supplying
information on the two guys who have been charged. Bruno is a Chase Vice
President. Nonetheless, since Chase has tens-of-thousands of VPs, Bruno is
still a grunt. You know your bank is too big when you count the VPs by the
tens-of-thousands.
We all know what’s going to happen when one guy starts
pointing fingers, it won’t be long until others join in. That fact, along with
reports that all these guys kept pointing up the line when this disaster
started to unfurl, has to be unsettling. It played out in London,
but the players there pointed to headquarters in New York City time and again when the losses
were skyrocketing; at last report well north of six billion dollars. The finger
pointing is going to spread up the food chain. The London traders claim they acted on guidance from
headquarters. That could get very ugly for all the players right up to Jamie
Dimon.
As if all that wasn’t enough, The New York Times broke a story about Chase bank hiring practices
in China.
The bottom line is that Chase seems to have a history of giving jobs to the
off-spring of high ranking individuals in the Communist Party who head state
owned businesses. Often businesses that have no relationships with Chase, at
least not until they hire somebody’s kid. Reports say the Feds have a
spreadsheet showing how hires connect to deals Chase was chasing.
Any one of these could be dismissed –as Chase is depicting
them– as the acts of lower level rogue employees. Taken together it seems clear
that the employees at JP Morgan Chase are under pressure to maximize profit by
any means necessary by a management that knows that the taxpayers are on the
hook to bail them out again. A management that reflects its leader’s ethics,
Jamie Dimon’s ethics.
Friday, August 16, 2013
Published in CommPRO.Biz 2013.08.16
Jamie’s Bad, Bad Month
Poor Jamie Dimon. These are defiantly not “Happy Days” for
the Chase Bank chief and Fonzie wannabe with his 1970s retro ducktail
hairstyle. With the cloud of the bank’s huge loss known as the “London Whale”
looming over him and federal authorities issuing arrest warrants against two
bank underlings involved in that loss – a loss much more likely the result of
the culture of risk and greed Dimon has installed in the bank’s DNA – it was bad enough.
Then an insider publication, Bank Director Magazine, released its 2013 “Bank Performance
Scorecard.” The magazine has an outside independent organization rank banks on
a broad scale of markers for its target audience as “An information resource for senior executives and
directors of financial institutions.” It would have been an
interesting “fly-on-the-wall” moment to see Dimon’s reaction when told that America’s
biggest bank – his bank – came
in 14th among all banks with assets north of $50 billion dollars.
You would think it would shake even an ego the size
of Dimon’s to discover that his gargantuan bank came in way down a list with
two regional banks a fraction of the size of Chase in the #1 & #2 slots.
And Chase didn’t just lose in some of the markers, they lost in all of them.
Actually almost all of the monster banks looked pretty anemic given the
advantages they enjoy. With tons of free money from the Fed to gamble on
anything they please, you would think they could trounce those regional banks. Makes
you wonder what members of the monster bank boards of directors who read Bank Director are thinking. More
important, what of the regulators we entrust to protect us against the economic
impact of these too-big-to-fail banks, what are they thinking?
This study puts the lie to Eric Holder’s thinking that
criminal charges against the top executives of these monster banks could
threaten their stability and therefore our economy. It seems obvious that the
executives of the smaller banks that led the Performance study outperformed the
monsters; and that all these banks have executives in place who could easily
replace those above them.
It is also obvious that it’s past time to literally cut
these monsters down to size. It is past time to return the controls installed
early in the 1930s that the bank lobby conned the Congress into removing; the
controls that would have prevented the current recession. The monster banks are
engaged in exactly the same nonsense that triggered this recession. Nonsense
that threatens our economy and that the Bank
Director study indicates is of little benefit to the bank’s shareholders.
The monster banks are a looming threat to every American.
Arrogant bankers epitomized by Jamie Dimon lecturing members of Congress,
flashing cufflinks with the Presidential seal, secure in the knowledge that his
lobbyists have bought and paid for their support. It’s time to put an end to
this ethically challenged era.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






