Wal-Mart, Same-Ol’, Same-Ol

They gathered by the thousands earlier this month (2013.06.06) at the Walton arena on the University of Arkansas campus in Fayetteville. It was the annual meeting of the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart. The crowd was largely made up of employees who had earned a trip to Fayetteville from their remote corner of the wonderful world of Wal-Mart through some display of loyalty. There were a few shareholders and high profile performers including Hugh Jackman, who was the meeting’s host. 

Unlike the Wal-Mart employees at the meeting, Jackman and the other celebs were not there at company expense, at least not Wal-Mart’s expense. Given the revenues generated for major motion picture and music companies by Wal-Mart –reportedly as much as 40% of their total income– we’ll guess that the stars were well compensated for their visit to Arkansas by someone.  

The affair was not all glitz, glitter, and company presentations. Time was set aside for participation by the shareholders, fifteen minutes out of the four hours, about 6%. That despite the fact that the shareholders had some serious beefs. Like what have you done about the rampant bribery, the deaths in Bangladesh factories and declining year to year store sales, things like that? Management’s answers? Less than satisfying. Easy for them knowing that the Walton family controls more than half the votes. As long as the family is happy, the management can ignore the rest of the world. 

A shareholder/employee commented on CEO Michael Duke’s nearly $21 million 2012 paycheck: “Times are tough for many Wal-Mart associates. We are stretching our paychecks to support our families.” Considering our low wages, she added, “I don’t think that’s right.” A considerable number of those in the audience cheered and applauded her comment. You can bet those folks won’t get a free ride to next year’s annual meeting, assuming they even keep their jobs.

For his part Duke said, "You operate with integrity, our company was founded on integrity. For Wal-Mart, compliance is an absolute. Make no mistake about it; we will do the right thing." It’s easy to see the disconnect right there. Duke obviously doesn’t understand that the “Right Thing” is not compliance. "The “Right Thing” is the ethical business model. “Compliance” is the letter of the law, working right at the edge of the law; Compliance is what you can get away with.

Compare this annual meeting with one held a month earlier in Omaha, Nebraska, the annual Berkshire Hathaway bash thrown by Warren Buffett. “Buffettpalooza,” as it’s called, attracted more than twice as many people, 35,000, all shareholders, all happily paying their own way. But those are just the surface differences when compared to the Wal-Mart annual meeting. The real difference lies in a culture of transparency at the core of Buffettpalooza, a culture that’s nowhere in sight at Wal-Mart.

Rule Or Ruin?

Many technical advances present two faces. For instance, we have an unrealistic view of life in the “Horse & Buggy” age. In the motor vehicle age we see death and injury rates and imagine that things were better in earlier times. They were not by any measure; horses are difficult to control at best and the drivers then were no more responsible than they are now. The key to reducing the downside of motor vehicles has been to make cars, trucks and big boy’s toys safer through technical improvements. The rules of the road -among other things- have to improve as well.

A new book, Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World, came out last week. Former tech journalist Christopher Steiner delves into the rise in the use of this digital tool as well as its impact on our society. In a Fast Company interview, he says he initially planned to just cover the use of algorithms on Wall Street. But from that starting point his research took him out further and further into our lives like the concentric waves when a rock splashes in a lake. Algorithms make Google search work. They drive customer service programs, they are everywhere.

Many of us know that algorithms underlie the high-speed traders who dominate our stock markets these days. They carry out most of the billions of trades the markets see every day. The upside is that the cost of trading has been going down with this volume. One downside is that some high-volume traders use this tool to shadow trades being exercised by pension funds and other wealth management entities. They can race ahead of these traders scooping up their target stocks and selling them to the funds at a higher price seconds later. The effect is to drive up the cost of the securities in your 401(k) or Grandma’s pension plan.  

Worse, they have contributed to the market’s abandonment of its only benefit to society, as a source of capital for business. In fact the markets have veered from the view of arguably the most talented investor in the world, Warren Buffett, who famously said, "The best time to sell a stock is never." Businesses are obsessed with daily prices and struggle to meet the quarterly expectations of the market instead of the long-term goals that could make them hugely more profitable.

There is a simple solution for this problem. Tax capital gains based on the length of time an investment is held. Just for fun let’s say if you hold an investment for twenty years or more, there would be no tax liability. Ten to twenty years, 5%, five to ten years 10%, two to five years 15%, one to two years 25%, one month to a year 50%, one week to a month 75%, less than a week 95%. Better than pirating value from Grandma’s pension, better for investors, better for business and their employees, better for America. Ethically there is no basis for the gambling hall culture on Wall Street; high speed trading is one gaming table we don’t need.

What’s Bugging America

A study by the highly regarded Pew Research Center provides insight into what is bugging Americans. Surprisingly it’s not the national debt, or immigration, which was the major issue in their last study done in 2009. In the Pew survey conducted in early December, income inequality leapt up about 50% from the 2009 study to be seen as America’s greatest source of tension. Two thirds of the respondents see the divide between the super rich and those on down the food chain as our major concern.

It gets more interesting when you look at the breakouts. As you might expect, the minorities, the poor, and the liberals are most likely to see inequality as the major cause of tension, but their scores were not up much from the 2009 study. The big jump came at the upper middle of the income ladder, 71% of those earning from $40,000 to $75,000 pointed to income inequality; that’s up more than 50% from 2009. Even the level of Republicans who see inequality as the number one issue is surprising, more than half, 55%.

More troubling, however, is the growing body of data indicating that opportunity to move up the ladder in the United States is in serious decline. The American Dream no longer tops the world. Canada and most western European nations now offer their citizens a better shot at that dream than we do. Among a number of studies one European study seems most comprehensive. Conducted by a group of scientists, it compares economic mobility across leading nations and we do not come off well. It shows that 40% of Americans born into the bottom 20% of our economy live out their lives there. Compare that to England at 30% and Denmark at 25%. Only 8% rise from the bottom fifth to the top fifth compared to 12% of the Brits and 14% of the Danes.

At the other end of the scale –the top of the economic pile– far more Americans born to wealth remain there than in other nations. Our absence of mobility is a threat to our nation. A threat seen not only by those on the left, but by leading right leaning players, Rick Santorum and Paul Ryan both expressed concern.

Economic inequality and economic mobility are linked at the hip. A tax code that favors the wealthy combined with a dramatic shift in taxing inequality have left those on the bottom and in the middle giving up a greater share of their income to support America. Billionaire Warren Buffett has been pointing to the flaws in our system for several years. We should all find it ludicrous –as he does– that he pays a lower share of his income than the lowest paid employee in his company.

We can’t keep the American Dream alive if we allow inequality to rule. We cannot  ask the middle-class and those on the bottom of the economic ladder to devote a greater share of their income to support needed services than we require from the rich. It’s not fair; it’s ethically abhorrent.

What's Fair

What's Fair

 

A Bloomberg Businessweek focus on wealth inequality (11.16.11) came up with some stunning conclusions. Using Census numbers –and a wide variety of past and present expert opinions– they point to the existing and growing disparity of wealth in America and conclude that it is bad for our economy. The gridlock we are experiencing leads those who are slipping behind to conclude that they have no hope, that they are at the mercy of the rich. The two ends of the economic ladder slip into bitter blame game positions.

Here’s where this game goes wrong for the rich. Income inequality leads to social instability. That leads to the belief that the system (read Stock Market) is rigged in favor of the ultra rich and you lose as much as a generation of investors. They point to the stock market following the crash in 1929. It took until 1954 for it to regain its pre-depression level, more than a quarter century. One wonders how long an extended downturn of that nature might last if we do not find our way out of the gridlock now engulfing us. Unlike the ‘30s, ‘40s, and ‘50s, in the era of the 401k etc. there are lots of middle class folks with a stake in the stock market these days.

We keep hearing that the rich create jobs. But the research shows that jobs are created by small businesses. Those folks are not the rich; they are what’s left of the middle class. They are looking for loans to grow and hire, but the banks that we all bailed out are not lending to small businesses. Instead they are back in the risky games that got us into this mess. Worse, small businesses are paying the high corporate taxes –not the big guys.

Speaking of taxes, it makes no sense for the poor and middle class to shell out a bigger piece of their income than the rich. Everyone seems to understand this except those in DC who hold to the job creation myth, and of course the rich who haven’t been able to do the math. When you talk to the savvy wealthy folks, you find that they favor a more equitable tax system. They understand that you can’t build a healthy economy on the backs of the poor. The smartest investor on the planet, Warren Buffett, figured it out years ago. No matter how big your slice is, you can’t do well if the pie keeps shrinking.

In the meantime, if the rich are not creating jobs with their wealth, what are they doing with their money? Well, their investments seem focused on commodities, where they speculate and drive up prices on food and oil; thanks for high gas prices. And they are driving the luxury market; if it’s expensive, they’re buying. Even the price of first class air travel – would you believe aircraft fitted with showers and private compartments? After all you have to look sharp when you arrive in some exotic locale. And what’s $15,000 or $20,000 for a plane ride. There are some pretty obvious ethical issues in all this. Too bad they don’t seem to matter much in our world where the Lobbyists rule in DC. How many of them do you think work for the middle class and the poor?