Published CommPro.biz 2014.04.08

Too Big To Manage, Not Too Big To Fail

In an effort to forestall another “Too Big Too Fail” recession, our Federal Reserve established the so-called Stress-Tests. The Fed looks at a number of aspects of a bank’s operations and determines its potential to go belly-up, requiring another taxpayer bailout, even triggering another recession. Frankly, none of the monster banks are stable. They engage in what would be illegal gambling except for the exemption the Congress gave them to label risky behavior as “Investments.” The eight largest banks have all been told to beef up; to add close to $70 billion in fresh capital.

The latest stress-test dealt a blow to Citicorp. The sprawling giant failed for the second time in two years. The last stress-test failure in 2012 led to a change in leadership, unseating the CEO. This is the second blow Citi has suffered in recent months; in February its Mexican operation was hit with a $400 million fraud. Basically the Fed found that Citi is out of control, not just too big to fail, but too big to manage. It’s clearly time to break up Citi’s operations; it’s time for Citi to become a bank again.

It’s obviously time for all the monster banks to break up their uncontrollable global operations. They’re all clearly too big to manage. When banks count their Vice Presidents by the tens of thousands, that alone should indicate that the same conditions that led to the breakup of the monster banks of the day in the 1930s are in place again today.  It’s also apparent that these behemoths serve no real purpose in our society.

Quite the opposite, the monster banks disrupt the banking sector. Aside from the role they play in manipulating interest rates and other hanky-panky, they make it more than difficult for our community banks. Take credit cards for instance. With the revenue from their legalized gambling operations, they can make offers that a legitimate community bank cannot match. They suck off the checking and savings accounts as well.

But unlike the community banks they don’t use the funds harvested from these sources to provide small business loans. They pour this cash into risky gambling ventures with no social benefit. That leaves the small businesses that create most of the new jobs in our economy starved for operating cash and our economy the worse for it. In addition to Citi, the Fed failed three international banks with operations in the United States including British giant HSBC which our Justice Department considered too big to jail when they were exposed as facilitating international criminal enterprises.

There are a host of reasons why the monster banks should become a thing of the past. Problem is they pour cash into the pockets of our legislators and thwart any effort to restrict or control them. Arrogant CEOs like Chase über kommandant Jamie Dimon strut and lecture our Congressional leaders, flashing cuff links with the Presidential Seal. Those sent to take care of the people’s business are instead increasingly beholden to those with the cash to dictate to them, among others the monster banks.

 
"Am I wrong?"--"Am I crazy?"

"What do you think?"

"Do you agree?"

Published CommPro.biz 2014.03.25

Congress Blocking Doctors

Last Friday (2014.03.21) was “Match Day.” On that day thousands of mostly young doctors opened an envelope that confirmed their acceptance into a residency program. In many cases it defines the path their medical career will take for the rest of their working life. In most cases they knew they were in and just awaited final confirmation. For some it was their first choice and this was the first year they had been down this path. For others, they settled for what they could get. Others were back for another try, having missed the cut in earlier years. Still others missed the cut this year and will have to wait for next year, or perhaps the next, or the next, often while staring at a massive student loan debt.

For a nation facing a massive physician shortage –100,000+/- by the end of this decade– this is insanity. The number of residency openings is controlled by the United States Congress. Why there should be a problem with supporting this vital aspect of our healthcare system escapes us. However, we are living under a nearly two decade old cap put in place by the Congress. Given those in that body who are focused on anything but serving the people of the United States, it’s not likely that we’ll see a change.

On the other hand there’s good news. The number of bright young people –split about evenly between men and women– who applied to medical schools and the number enrolled as first-year students hit record highs this year. Add to that a dramatic increase in young doctors choosing family medicine. Five years ago it was under 60% with more than four in ten opting for specialties. This year it’s over 66% with less than one in three aiming for the specialties. That indicates a growing awareness among young doctors that the team-based comprehensive care ACA encourages is where the future lies. Primary care doctors will head-off serious illness in the future, saving lives, improving the lives of their patients and reducing healthcare costs.

There’s a new day dawning; young people entering medicine see it. Beat illness to the draw, make prevention the goal. The old model, treat people after they get sick is on the way out. Paying doctors based on the number of patients they run through their practice is so over. Payment needs to be focused on outcomes, on the overall health of the patients under a doctor’s care. America spends more per patient than any country on this planet. Yet we rank among third world countries when it comes to outcomes. The ACA is a baby step in the right direction.

Our lawmakers need to do the job they were elected to do, to serve the interest of all the people of the United States. They can begin by opening up more residency slots for young doctors who have fought their way into medicine, and are ready to go to work.

 Published CommPro.biz 2014.02.10

Legally But Not Medically Necessary

Depending on whose numbers you look at, somewhere between 5% and 40% of the cost of healthcare in America is spent on “Defensive Medicine.”  In 1994 the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment defined it: “Defensive medicine occurs when doctors order tests, procedures, or visits, or avoid high-risk patients or procedures, primarily (but not necessarily or solely) to reduce their exposure to malpractice liability.”

The body formally known as the Trial Lawyers Association, the barracuda bar that strikes fear into the hearts of all in the medical world, says that defensive medicine does not exist. They see it as a big scam that the medical types use as an excuse to ratchet up their income. And while we don’t buy that, there is a certain amount of truth in what they say. Testing facilities owned by doctors, hospitals and others in the game certainly benefit. As do those who consult to affirm the decisions made by their colleagues.

The leading solution is Tort Reform, restrictions on the legal profession. And/or limitations on the amount those harmed by the medical system can collect. Some of those reforms have been set up by state governments, however, and they don’t seem to help. That either means the lawyers are right, that unnecessary medical stuff reflects greed among medical providers, or that the practice is so ingrained that fear makes it near impossible for them to stop.

A totally different approach is now under consideration in Florida and Georgia, a concept that eliminates the possibility that any medical player could be sued. The Patients’ Compensation system would take medical errors out of our legal system entirely. Panels of experts would be tasked with evaluating claims and awarding the injured party funds to cover their losses. It would be quick and fair.

We spend more per-capita than other countries on healthcare but our outcomes rank below third world nations. We fail to make it into the top twenty-five in most cases. On the other hand our VA Health Care system provides excellent care at 40% less per patient than the national average. That’s an impressive number made even more impressive when you look at their patients. Mostly a bunch of beat up old folks, with some really beat up younger folks from our recent wars. Compare that to the national patient base; it includes all those folks under forty who are in relatively good health.

Oh yes, the VA enjoys a few other advantages. Their people don’t have to worry about lawsuits. And they don’t have to spend a lot of time filling out paperwork for insurers. They were among the first to go digital; any Vet can go into any VA facility in the world and they can pull up their records in seconds. All this allows them to focus on prevention. And the VA can negotiate to hold down drug costs, unlike Medicare that is prohibited by Big Pharma who has our Congress bought and paid for.

"Am I wrong?"--"Am I Nuts?"-

-"What do you think?"--"Do you agree?"

Published in CommPRO.biz 2014.01.24

 

Big Pharma Has Congress 

by the Jugular

Andrew Witty, Glaxo Smith Kline CEO, announced last month (December 16) that Glaxo will stop paying doctors to promote their products and stop paying their sales representatives based on the number of prescriptions doctors write. It would be nice to think that this action results from an epiphany on Glaxo’s part. It’s more likely a duck-and-cover move triggered by a nasty bribery mess in China and an upcoming Affordable Care Act disclosure requirement.

It is, however, welcome. This, we hope, will trigger moves (don’t hold your breath) by other Pharma Monsters to fall in line. Pay-to-prescribe -along with Pharma advertising- make up two of the more egregious practices Pharma uses that drive healthcare costs sky high in the United States. The biggie by far is the hold they have on our Congress. Their “K” Street lobbyists lay bucks by the bushel on members of the Congress. In return, those sworn to work in our interest instead work for the drug companies.

By manipulating patent laws and exempting Pharma from anti-trust laws, drug companies have driven costs for their products beyond belief. A drug that costs a few hundred dollars to make, costs a desperate cancer patient close to a hundred grand for each dose. The patient goes bankrupt and the taxpayers pick up the tab. There is no other drug. The doctor says take it or die.

Pharma would have us believe that these drugs cost over a billion dollars to bring to market. A cruel and blatant lie; a study published in the British Medical Journal shows that the average $1.3 billion dollars the drug companies claim it costs, is actually about $90 thousand dollars. The rest is part BS and mostly marketing expenditures. Worse, most of their research funds go to tweaking existing drugs in an effort to stretch out patents on their best sellers.

We keep hearing about how much cheaper it is to buy drugs in places like Canada. Why is that? Because they have a single payer healthcare system that negotiates lower prices. In America, our Congress has forbidden Medicare to do anything like that. So a nation with fewer people than live in California can muscle the drug companies and we can’t. To make it worse the Congress has so limited fraud investigative funds that Medicare catches only a fraction of the bad guys. Like one doc in California who games the system by prescribing name-brand drugs to thousands of low income patients. Drugs’ costing as much as 30 times equally effective generic versions. There are thousands of these docs milking Medicare for Big Pharma and costing the taxpayers billions.

Big Pharma’s pill bill is killing us. Government controlled healthcare serves over half of Americans. With that kind of clout we can negotiate lower costs. Lower costs in drugs, lower costs in every aspect of our out-of-control healthcare sector. We spend more per-capita than any other nation on earth and yet our outcomes don’t even rank in the top 25%. We need to clean out the Congressional medicine chest.

"Am I wrong?"--"Am I Nuts?"--"What do you think?"--"Do you agree?"

Published in CommPRO.Biz 2013.08.16

 

Jamie’s Bad, Bad Month

Poor Jamie Dimon. These are defiantly not “Happy Days” for the Chase Bank chief and Fonzie wannabe with his 1970s retro ducktail hairstyle. With the cloud of the bank’s huge loss known as the “London Whale” looming over him and federal authorities issuing arrest warrants against two bank underlings involved in that loss – a loss much more likely the result of the culture of risk and greed Dimon has installed in the bank’s DNA –  it was bad enough.

Then an insider publication, Bank Director Magazine, released its 2013 “Bank Performance Scorecard.” The magazine has an outside independent organization rank banks on a broad scale of markers for its target audience as “An information resource for senior executives and directors of financial institutions.” It would have been an interesting “fly-on-the-wall” moment to see Dimon’s reaction when told that America’s biggest bank – his bank – came in 14^th among all banks with assets north of $50 billion dollars.

You would think it would shake even an ego the size of Dimon’s to discover that his gargantuan bank came in way down a list with two regional banks a fraction of the size of Chase in the #1 & #2 slots. And Chase didn’t just lose in some of the markers, they lost in all of them. Actually almost all of the monster banks looked pretty anemic given the advantages they enjoy. With tons of free money from the Fed to gamble on anything they please, you would think they could trounce those regional banks. Makes you wonder what members of the monster bank boards of directors who read Bank Director are thinking. More important, what of the regulators we entrust to protect us against the economic impact of these too-big-to-fail banks, what are they thinking?

This study puts the lie to Eric Holder’s thinking that criminal charges against the top executives of these monster banks could threaten their stability and therefore our economy. It seems obvious that the executives of the smaller banks that led the Performance study outperformed the monsters; and that all these banks have executives in place who could easily replace those above them.

It is also obvious that it’s past time to literally cut these monsters down to size. It is past time to return the controls installed early in the 1930s that the bank lobby conned the Congress into removing; the controls that would have prevented the current recession. The monster banks are engaged in exactly the same nonsense that triggered this recession. Nonsense that threatens our economy and that the Bank Director study indicates is of little benefit to the bank’s shareholders.

The monster banks are a looming threat to every American. Arrogant bankers epitomized by Jamie Dimon lecturing members of Congress, flashing cufflinks with the Presidential seal, secure in the knowledge that his lobbyists have bought and paid for their support. It’s time to put an end to this ethically challenged era.

Published in CommPro.biz 2013.08.08

Anything Goes

The Monster Banks’ best investment over the last few decades has been the tens of millions they poured into the pockets of the Congress through their “K” Street lobbyists. It paid off, billions in profits that come right out of the pockets of every American. The bankers’ big score was the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, AKA the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB) named for three members of our Congress who giggled all the way to their banks.

GLB gutted the Glass/Steagall Act; legislation written in the early 1930s limiting banks to the business of banking: taking deposits, making loans, supporting our economy. As a reward we agreed to insure the money of the bank’s depositors, so that should the bank go bust, the money you had in the bank would be safe (up to $10,000). GLB took down the fences, but left the taxpayers on the hook should the banks fail.

That and another gift from Congress, a law exempting Wall Street from gambling laws, opened the door to the crazy stuff that drove our economy off the cliff. The Monster Banks could use your deposits to bet on almost anything, always backed by America’s taxpayers. There are less than a dozen banks in this arena, the To-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks that we bailed out when the derivative fueled house of cards they created collapsed. Your corner neighborhood bank didn’t play this game. Unfortunately they suffered along with the rest of us, worse because the TBTF banks buoyed by gambling profits held a competitive edge. 

The TBTF Monster Banks are right back at it. Taking zero interest bucks from the Fed to gamble instead of investing in our economy. There’s a new game in town, commodities. Ten years ago the TBTF Banks got the Federal Reserve to set up a “Temporary” ruling allowing them to deal in commodities. When their mortgage game evaporated, the Monster Banks jumped into this marketplace. With all the free money at their disposal they bought grain and oil, even oil wells and tankers. They are into power, manipulating your electric bill, Enron redux.

Metals -steel, aluminum, copper- all commodity markets they can manipulate; a buck on a new car, a few pennies on a cell phone, a tenth of a penny on your soft drink can. Goldman Sachs, the mother of all TBTF Monster Banks, owns a couple dozen warehouses in Detroit full of aluminum bars. They shuffle them around from one warehouse to another in a dance that allows them to circumvent the law and jack up the cost of aluminum. Anything goes, ethics walks the plank.

The “Temporary” commodity games regulations expire next month. The Monster Banks are working hard to extend it. It better not happen. More important, we must get these banks out of the other gambling halls we have allowed them to create. We have to stop this nonsense and cut these big banks -quite literally- down to size. If we fail, it’s just a matter of time until we have to bail them out again.

Published in CommPro.biz 2013.04.30

Whose $$$$s Anyway?

Two decades ago, John O’Shea, a National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientist at the taxpayer supported entity, was pursuing JAK3, a protein that attaches itself to immune cells. Dr. O’Shea and his team at the NIH thought JAK3 might be used to fight autoimmune disease, specifically arthritis. In 1993 the NIH contacted Pfizer to see if the Pharma giant might have an interest in partnering with Dr. O’Shea in this research. Pfizer said “no thanks” because under the rules in place back then they would have had to share any resulting revenue from the collaboration with the taxpayers who fund the NIH.

Big Pharma’s “K” Street lobbyists had that requirement removed in 1995 and so Pfizer signed on in 1996. Fast forward twenty years and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approves Pfizer’s new arthritis medication Xeljanz® (tofacitinib citrate). Three cheers all around says the NIH for the teamwork made possible by Dr. O’Shea’s discovery of JAK3, and his team’s collaboration over twenty years with the folks at Pfizer that led to Xeljanz®.

Big surprise, Pfizer doesn’t see it that way. They say that the good doctor’s work moved into the public domain when it was published in 1994, that anybody could have used it. So far as the cooperative research with Dr. O’Shea goes, Pfizer didn’t end up with anything they could patent, so it was of no value. It was all the work and the more than a billion bucks Pfizer invested that resulted in a new arthritis drug, Xeljanz®. Pfizer is charging Medicare over $2,000 a month for each and every patient on Xeljanz®, a mind-numbing $25,000.00 taxpayer bucks a year.

This whole scenario is so outrageous you wouldn’t believe it if you didn’t know it’s true. A private entity takes the work of a government researcher; brushing a deal aside they made to work with the NIH. They take all the credit for developing this drug, adding the standard boilerplate claim that they sunk a billion bucks into the effort, yada, yada, yada.

A figure debunked last year in a British Medical Journal study. All these billion plus drug development claims start with a half billion they might have earned had they invested in some once-upon-a-time index fund over the same twenty-year period. Then there is $300-$400 million they get in tax credits. At the end of the day Pfizer has maybe a couple hundred million in Xeljanz®, no small amount but nothing close to a billion. Talk about corporate welfare or voodoo economics. It’s time for this nonsense to stop. Without Dr. O’Shea’s team at the NIH there would be no Xeljanz®.  We want our share of the bucks.

The stranglehold Big Pharma has over the Congress is shameful. From endorsing the theft of taxpayer funded science to an outrageous ban that prevents Medicare and Medicaid from negotiating what they pay for drugs, the corrosive impact of corporate spending in our democratic process is overwhelming. It has to stop.

Published in CommPro.biz 2013.04.25

 

HSBC Scot Free?

In study after study there is nothing to support the idea that “C” Suite occupants are irreplaceable. There’s an occasional example of a corporate leader’s departure negatively impacting a company’s performance: Steve Jobs’s voluntary ten-year absence from Apple left the company floundering; the jury is out at this point following his death in the fall of 2011 but the company is certainly not going to collapse. However, in all but a few cases there is an able individual in the wings ready to take over.

That makes a Department of Justice decision to give HSBC a get-out-of-jail-free card so outrageous. Listen to Attorney General Eric Holder earlier this month (2013.03.08) before a Senate Committee: "I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute -- if we do bring a criminal charge -- it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy," How dumb is that? What an insult to the tens of thousands of honest HSBC people to imagine that there are not lots of capable executives at HSBC who could step into the shoes of the boneheads who have turned an international financial giant into a gigantic criminal enterprise.

Let’s review: HSBC laundered carloads of money for the Sinaloa Drug Cartel, who are reported to have murdered thousands of people. HSBC created shams to help North Korea, Iran and others beat sanctions. HSBC financed Al Qaeda and a wide range of terrorist organizations along with mobsters in Russia, and they provided good old tax cheats a place to stash their earnings. That’s just a smattering of the flat-out criminal activity at HSBC. And the DOJ is letting them get away with it? Just have coffee in the same coffee shop as a terrorist and you’ll be grilled by the FBI. And HSBC gets a pass? Unbelievable!

Where does Holder think the “indications” of worldwide economic collapse if we jail these crooks is coming from? From the same HSBC lobbyists who pour bucks into the pockets of members of the Congress. Fortunately there are a few on the hill who are willing to stand up to these crooks, Carl Levin and Elizabeth Warren among others. Still, one estimate of support in the Senate for a break-up of the monster banks sees fewer than forty votes. Can you imagine how few members of the House would support such an action?

Everyone knows that’s what’s needed. The Dallas Fed chairman and at least one other Fed Board member have documented the need to break up the too-big-to-fail banks. These banks are the real threat to the world’s economic health. And until we treat criminal banksters for what they are, crooks, and put them in jail where crooks belong, they are going to keep right on breaking the law and risking another crash with their roulette wheel style of banking. Why not, when the top law enforcement officer in the United States gives them a pass?

Banks Behaving Badly

“We’re doing what a bank is supposed to do.” That’s JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon before a US Senate Committee after a two billion dollar gambling loss that has since grown to nearly six billion and is forecast to hit even higher numbers. Dimon was much harder on himself than were the Senators, or the members of a House Committee in a subsequent hearing. 

No surprise, members of Congress have good reason to be friendly. Dimon has pitched millions into Congressional war chests -more to Republicans, but lots to go around. The committee members understandably tossed softball questions. Dimon was decked out in cuff links with the presidential seal just so everyone would know where he was coming from. 

Unbelievably nobody called him on his, “We’re doing what a bank is supposed to do” line. This from a “Bankster,” as the Economist has labeled the out-of-control leaders of our financial sector. The billions lost on bad bets placed by one of its traders (AKA gamblers) in London are the least of the problems Dimon is facing. 

Chase is ensnared in the evolving Libor scandal that has a group of international banksters fixing interbank lending rates, impacting every loan rate imaginable. 

The incredibly complex Libor rate fixing scheme crosses civil and criminal legal lines. Dimon was fully aware of his bank’s involvement in this racket when he delivered his “What a bank is supposed to do” line; so we must assume that he thinks juggling interest rates worldwide is what banks do. 

That isn’t even the worst it. When Dimon was flaunting his control over those we send to Washington to do our business, he was fully aware that Chase had just shelled out a seventy-five million dollar fine for rigging a bid on a three billion dollar sewer bond deal that pushed Birmingham, Alabama into bankruptcy. A deal they cinched with a three million dollar bribe to Goldman Sachs. Chase and a host of other banksters have been rigging municipal bond auctions for decades.

This all came out when the Feds convicted three minor players from GE Capital they nailed rigging bond auctions. The Feds got their hands on recordings of telephone conversations between banksters making highly illegal deals to pass municipal bond business around among the banks. In addition to the bankster types from GE who are going to jail, scores of others from virtually every major bank in America and many international banks as well have taken a plea deal. 

Let’s be clear about what’s going on here. 

Between the Libor racket and the municipal bond rigging scam- the banksters have ripped off everyone in America to the tune of untold billions. JP Morgan Chase is not alone in these Mafia style rackets, but if that’s what Jamie Dimon thinks “banks do” then he has a different ethical standard than most of us hold.

Say What?

We were pulled up short when a financial expert on a national radio show put forth the most nonsensical causal scenario for the 2008 economic collapse imaginable. It began with, “As we know, the cause of the collapse” –as if to imply that what followed was verifiable fact, set in stone. Actually what followed was nonsense. It was an effort by the reckless too-big-to-fail banks to shift the blame for their disaster to, well, anyone but them. It was even less plausible than the ongoing effort to pin the economic train wreck on some imaginary Clinton era mandate forcing banks to knowingly lend to people who they knew would never be able to repay the loans. Right; and even if this pipe dream were true, would it have taken eight plus years for those mortgages to sour?

While Bill Clinton had a role in running our economy off the cliff, it had nothing to do with any mortgage mandate. In 1999 Clinton signed into law a bill repealing the Glass-Steagall Act that had protected us from this kind of nonsense for sixty plus years. So Clinton played a minor part in passing a bill nicknamed the “Citigroup Relief Act.” At the time, Congressman John Dingell argued on the House floor that this bill would result in creating “too-big-to-fail banks and that should they get into trouble taxpayers would have to bail them out.” With help from another ill advised law, the 2000 “Commodity Futures Modernization Act” exempting the banks and others from State gambling laws it took less than a decade for Dingell’s prophecy to play out.

First let’s get things straight. While there are minor players in the 2008 tragedy, the too-big-to-fail banks bear 99.99% of the blame. Had they not been on the brink of failure, in need of a taxpayer bailout, there would be no recession. They put themselves in this position by bundling mortgages that they referred to as “Crap,” strong-arming the rating services into stamping them AAA, and selling them to anyone dumb enough to buy them. These banks pushed the little folk in the mortgage pipeline for more and more sub-prime mortgages until the whole house of cards collapsed. Everyone got hit, including some of the too-big-to-fail banks, and just as John Dingell predicted we had to bail them out. That left the big banks in good shape and the rest of us literally holding the bag; an empty bag.

So what are the Wall Street bankers up to? Why this propaganda campaign to shift the blame for the horrific recession we are still struggling to overcome? That is pretty clear. They are engaged in the same risky stuff that got us into this mess in 2008 and they want to keep right on doing it. Ethics be damned, they think that pouring millions into the pockets of the Washington crowd will stave off sensible regulation like the Volcker rule. They may be right; an outrageous lie combined with the big bucks may do it in an election year.

Let’s hope they’re wrong.

They’re Back – 
Run For Your Lives!

What do you think our leaders would do when confronted by the imminent collapse of a sector of our economy whose assets are equal to 56% of our GDP? Given what they did in 2008 –properly we think– we can safely assume they would prop up the institutions at risk. Are you surprised that five of the banks we rescued in 2008 now have assets equal to 56% of our GDP*? In 2006 -before the collapse- these same five banks’ combined assets equaled 47% of our GDP*.

Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, five of the players whose reckless actions drove the world economy off the cliff, are lined up to do it again. Their assets grew more than 40% from 2006 through 2011*. Why? That’s no mystery, the banks know and investors know that if there’s another collapse we will bail the Zombies out again. With the taxpayers on the hook, big banks are gambling with the same risky stuff that led to the 2008 collapse –derivatives, swaps etc., the stuff the bankers refer to as “crap.”

If it goes all wrong, the bankers and their investors have the taxpayers ready to bail them out again. Where else would investors put their bucks, high returns no risk? Published reports say all three rating services along with a covey of regional Federal Reserve presidents, see a bailout for the Zombie Banks down the road. Meanwhile, your neighborhood community bank –the bank down the street on the corner– doesn’t have an investment (AKA gambling hall) division; putting them at a distinct disadvantage in finding investors and customers.

We know how to solve this problem, been there, done that. Eighty years ago when the wheels fell off our economy our nation faced the same dilemma. They busted up the big banks and made them choose the sector of the banking world in which they wanted to operate. The Glass-Steagall Act separated investment banks from the regular commercial banks that we ordinary folk deal with.

During the 1990s’ deregulation frenzy the investment banks –Goldman Sachs in particular– pressed hard to break down this wall. In 1999 they succeeded Glass-Steagall was repealed. Then they convinced the Congress to exempt them from the gambling laws and they were off to the races. Take any risk, bet on any crazy thing, as long as you could call it an investment – it is legal. Within a few years they distorted the derivative and commodity markets turning them into Zombie bank gambling halls. Here’s the catch. They know they can’t lose. They know the suckers (AKA customers) take the losses. Worse comes to worse the taxpayers will be stuck with the mess. The bankers and investors will be just fine.

We all know what happened in the decade following the repeal of Glass-Steagall. We had to bail the banks out and now they are fine; back doing the exact same things that drove us off the cliff. Meanwhile the rest of America –and the world– is working its way out the hole they left us in. They are not doing anything illegal; however, ethically it stinks. It’s time to break up the Zombie banks and put them back in their cages, investment banks on one side of the business and commercial banks on the other. If not, we’ll be bailing them out again. They are counting on it

 *Bloomberg 04.19.12

Dear A.I.G., I Quit!

Poor Jake!

An A.I.G. EVP vented on the New York Times opinion page today (3.25.09). Jake DeSantis is quitting because he has been betrayed by the company that has paid him to make money for them trading “Commodities, Energy, (and) Derivatives” according to his public profile on the professional social media site, LinkedIn. Now A.I.G. (and most of the rest of us) expect him to give back the +/- million buck bonus he was paid earlier this month.

Jake says it’s unfair that A.I.G. is reneging on the deal they promised him. That the division where he labored 10-14 hours a day was not responsible for the “credit swaps” that sent A.I.G. reeling. That he had agreed to work for $1 a year on the belief that he would be rewarded for his effort with the big bonus in question. It was a deal, a “contract in writing,” and he should get to keep his money. So there!

Jake says, “I was raised by schoolteachers working multiple jobs in a world of closing steel mills. My hard work earned me acceptance to M.I.T., and the institute’s generous financial aid enabled me to attend. I had fulfilled my American dream.” Jake graduated from M.I.T. S.M., Materials Science in 1992. His thesis? "Chemical Vapor Deposition of Iridium and Rhodium from Organometallic Precursors conducted at the Los Alamos National Laboratory”, where he was an intern.

Bright guy, most of us can’t pronounce that stuff let alone understand what it is about. So where did this scientific genius head? To the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS) where he worked in “Equity derivatives trading.” Isn’t that what’s being called “toxic” these days? After six years at UBS he moved to A.I.G.. Over the last eleven years Jake made a lot of money.

He says, “I know that because of hard work I have benefited more than most during the economic boom and have saved enough that my family is unlikely to suffer devastating losses during the current bust. Some might argue that members of my profession have been overpaid, and I wouldn’t disagree.”

Hard work? Actually most would argue that commodity and derivative trading during the boom years that Jake has been at it, was a piece of cake. If -as he says- he and his fellows have been overpaid, why did it not occur to him earlier that the retention contracts he and others signed to hang in there and try to salvage the company that has made him rich were wrong? Is he saying that the sailors on a sinking ship should be given a contract assuring them of a big pay check before they agree to help to bail it out? Just because the hole in the bottom of the ship is in the bow doesn’t relieve those in the stern from the need to help save the ship.

That’s what it’s all about, Jake. If the American people -few of whom are as privileged as you- are going to throw billions of their hard earned dollars into saving your company, shouldn’t you be willing to work for a $1 a year and live off the fat of the land (all the money you made in the last eleven years) for a couple years to help save the company that has been so good to you? When little folks all over the country are being asked to give up part of their earnings, why are you whining all the way back to your luxury life?

Where is the moral compass that allows your vindictive plan to be sure that the company that put you where you are and/or the taxpayers who are trying to save the company do not get one cent of the bonus that you are giving up. Where would you be if A.I.G. had been allowed to fail? There would be no bonus. Nor would there be most of the other goodies that assure that you and yours will live comfortably for the rest of your lives.

You stepped off the ethical high ground when it even crossed your mind that you should be paid to do the right thing. Maybe you didn't lose any money for your company but you are a loser Jake!